I spend a lot of time thinking.
Through applied and theoretical research, I inform how human decisions interact with bias in the judicial setting. I study juries and the individual difference of the jurors that comprise them.
My journey has led me to the intersection of social psychology and law where I explore how our beliefs are construed socially, evolve our world views, defining how we make decisions and interact with those around us. This exploration goes beyond academic curiosity; it reflects my profound desire to connect with the essence of individuality in its purest form.
It’s my compassionate dive into the human condition, which endeavors to understand how the concept of justice interacts with dimensions of our societal fabric. My research focus surrounds juror decision-making, individual differences, group process, and the theoretical frameworks that connect these features of individualism and the concept of justice.
