Through applied and theoretical research, I inform how human decisions interact with bias in the judicial setting. I study juries and the individual difference of the jurors that comprise them.
My journey has led me to the intersection of social psychology, law, and organizational communication where I explore how our beliefs are construed socially that evolve our world views defining how we make decisions and interact with those around us. This exploration goes beyond academic curiosity; it reflects my profound desire to connect with the essence of individuality, in its purest form.
This quest is not merely academic; it’s a compassionate dive into the human condition, striving to understand how the concept of justice interacts with our societal fabric. My focus intends to sharpen on the social psychology of juror decision-making, investigating how individual differences influence justice through the collection of individual differences that manifest as group dispositions.
